Brooklyn, NY +Homeless Man Charged In Massive 10 Alarm Fire+
Greenpoint, Brooklyn, NY - A 59-year-old homeless man was taken into custody and charged in connection with the massive 10 alarm fire that destroyed a warehouse complex in Brooklyn.
Investigators were looking into whether the man and a group of other homeless men set the fire on May 2 while trying to steal copper wire from inside the building.
Investigators said they believed the men might have been attempting to burn the insulation off the copper, which may have been what caused the massive fire.
The man was being questioned by members of the New York City police and fire departments and the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
Also the owner of the warehouse Joshua Guttman, was served today with criminal environmental charges. The Brooklyn DA has charged Joshua Guttman and his son, Jack Guttman, with 434 counts of failure to maintain privately owned waterfront property where the Greenpoint Warehouses stood.
That's one count for each day they allegedly failed to make repairs to deteriorating piers and bulkheads after being ordered by the city to do so. They face up to $5,000 in fines for each misdemeanor, or more than $2 million total.
7 Comments:
At 10:50 AM, Anonymous said…
now you see !
everybody said Josh Guttman is at fault..
you have be "Dan Lkaf Zchus"
At 10:50 AM, Anonymous said…
now you see !
everybody said Josh Guttman is at fault..
you have be "Dan Lkaf Zchus"
At 1:23 PM, myhumbleopinion said…
He is facing environmental violations that is a normal on almost every house in the entire city its nothing unusual.
BTW, immediately after the fire, I spoke to someone that knows Josh personally and he told me “there is no way in the world that Josh did it” now I see he was right.
At 11:52 PM, Anonymous said…
Dearest Shloma!
I really hate criticizing you, since you're doing a wonderful job, by giving us unbiased reportings!
But I'm a little bothered by the headline of this post.
"Brooklyn, NY +Owners And Homeless Man Charged In Massive 10 Alarm Fire+"
By putting together the homeless man & the owner being charged for the fire, it makes it seem as if the owner is also charged over the fire, which in fact, by reading the entire report, it's clearly not the case!
Please forgive me, if I may have offended you, which was certainly not my intention, it was rather a suggestion!
Truly Yours,
All the best!
At 12:08 AM, Anonymous said…
Dearest Shloma! I really hate criticizing you, since you're doing a wonderful job, by giving us unbiased reportings! But I'm a little bothered by the headline of this post. "Brooklyn, NY +Owners And Homeless Man Charged In Massive 10 Alarm Fire+"By putting together the homeless man & the owner being charged for the fire, it makes it seem as if the owner is also charged over the fire, which in fact, by reading the entire report, it's clearly not the case!Please forgive me, if I may have offended you, which was certainly not my intention, it was rather a suggestion! Truly Yours, All the best!
At 12:47 AM, Anonymous said…
Great point Mr. L'man Hu'Emes! & Thanks Shlomo for fixing the problem!
At 1:22 AM, Anonymous said…
I was also wondering about that headline.
Its a good day for environmentalist wakkos and a sad one for us normal people.
Post a Comment
<< Home